Showing posts with label Solutions. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Solutions. Show all posts

Monday, June 27, 2011

Racial prejudice/tension between teachers: Two cents from my "life baggage"

           This weekend, a professor had us discussing readings on a forum with our cohort-mates. Because this is a class on diversity in the middle school, we discuss many hot-button topics. In the context of one such discussion, a comment was made concerning the media's attention to school violence and violence in society in general. Without getting into too many details, the comment has struck up hurt feelings around a sweeping statement on the history of white people in America.

          After speaking with a two white colleagues and friends in this class this morning, I was a bit shocked and saddened to see how deeply the remark cut them. It cut them deeply enough to make them feel alienated from the rest of the class, as other remarks along the same vein were made in the online discussion. The whole cohort concept relies on the fact that we will feel like a "team" of new teachers, a support system meant to make everyone better. If any one is left feeling alienated, I don't believe the cohort, as individuals and as a whole, can be successful, so I'm look forward to a civil and honest discussion soon, so everyone can come to a new understanding, and possibly acceptance, of the other side, in the interests of personal growth and growth as new teachers. However, as this is still fresh, I want to discuss this now, as I don't think this phenomena of deeply set racial tension and even prejudice among teachers is uncommon, especially in schools where the racial balance tips largely in favor of one group over others. First, let me say that I can only speculate on the underlying causes of this tension and prejudice between teachers. I have no hard facts or evidence. Only personal experiences to inform me here.

     With that disclaimer out of the way, I think teachers bring "life baggage" into the school and classroom. This doesn't necessarily mean that teachers are automatically prejudiced against some students and teachers or that when it does happen, it is malicious. It simply means that their experiences in life sum up into their values, thoughts, words, and actions. A major part of most "life baggage" is cultural experiences, including race. Thinking back on my experiences with race issues, I probably have a relatively rosier experience than most other people of my race.  I went to school with a diverse set of kids, and keep the company of a diverse set of people. Diverse races, religions, values, et cetera. On the occasions that I did experience racial prejudice and tension, I could isolate the experiences. It didn't make the experience less hurtful when living through it, but it did make continuing to live past it easier knowing that the experience of prejudice and tension was largely an isolated one.

          No sweeping generalization of one group of people could come from my experiences, because I could thinking of several counterexamples to the bad experiences. From this I learned that a person's genealogy does not necessarily reflect within the person standing in front me. While my "life baggage" has a diverse set of experiences and views, others don't, especially when they come from places (both literal and figurative) and families that carry a heavy historical burden. For example, slavery is an issue that burns to the core of some black people here in America. The recorded mistreatment of black people (by various groups of people, including other black people) through time has carried over into this generation. For some people, it is easier to put historical baggage where it belongs. For others, they continue to deal with it, especially when their own circumstances and experiences recall those that happened in past times. Mind you, this doesn't just occur with members of a "wronged" race/ethnicity. I know of white friends who were shocked and horrified to discover that some of their ancestors were slave owners. Some of these friends feel the need to "make up" for what their ancestors did, just like some ancestors of slaves feel it is their place to make the ancestors of the slave owners "pay" for what they (the ancestors) did.

           Part of the racial tension/prejudice in schools comes from these types of attitudes on history. Some people are trying to make amends for history, while others are trying to exact revenge. However, the people who revenge "should" be exacted upon are long dead and gone, as are the people who "should" get amends. The other thing is that our generation was not involved in historical events, and as a result, making amends/exacting revenge is not our place anyway. It is okay for a person's history to make up a part of life baggage; in fact, I encourage this practice, as it makes us all more aware people of what's going on in the world. It also helps us to become more open to diversity. However,  historical events shouldn't make up the bulk of it. This is especially important for teachers, as our students get to see some of our life baggage. If most of your baggage consists of racial mistrust and fear, your students see it and take it into themselves. In largely homogeneous schools, the students are not exposed to diverse experiences. They vicariously experience a bit of what their teachers did.

          While I won't dare to presume to know what either the commenter or my other colleagues have going on their heads, I will say that I think what I've discussed comes into play in the larger phenomena going on here. This is not to be taken as an excuse or justification for racial prejudice. This is a posting that aims at understanding what lies beneath racial prejudice, so that we can begin healing the wounds caused by the baggage some of us carry. I'm interested in hearing other perspectives of this issue. While it is not talked about often, racial tension/prejudice between teachers is important enough to merit serious, civil, and honest conversations. The more we as teachers are aware and active of what we bring, baggage-wise, into the classroom, the better we serve all our students, but especially those without access to diverse viewpoints.



'A' for Effort?

Just got wind of an LA Times story: Los Angeles Unified School District is putting a ceiling on the percentage that homework can count towards a grade. Teachers can no longer count homework as no more than 10% of a student's grade. 

Due to time constraints (the siren song of grad work beckons), I won't get into this debate now (though I'm curious to hear where other teachers stand on this policy). However, I do want to pull something out of article that popped out and deserves a quick note:

"Critics — mostly teachers — worry that the policy will encourage students to slack off assigned work and even reward those who already disregard assignments. And they say it could penalize hardworking students who receive higher marks for effort."

If you read a paragraph prior, you will clearly understand that some students not doing their homework aren't ignoring it for the heck of it. They have other more pressing things to do, like, supporting their families by working at night. If I had to choose between making money for my family and doing a coloring sheet or 50 practice problems when I understood well after, say, 10 problems, I'm choosing the money too. Or if I'm having to go to school all day and then go home to cramped and loud apartment, I'm not really caring about the Ms. So-and-So's paragraph asking me to regurgitate the notes from today. 

Don't get me wrong; I'm not anti-homework. In fact, I very much like it when it is relevant, reasonable, and most importantly, purposeful. Nothing irked me more in school than having to do again, something that we already did or something that really didn't help me to understand the concept. Indeed, engagement and practice with material being taught is essential for understanding. Endless amounts of irrelevant, unreasonable, redundant, and just plain dumb homework is not. 

Because my homework is meaningful and is meant for practice and engagement, I don't mind counting it for around 5-10% of the grade. A professor of mine likened the grading percentage makeups to sports: homework is the practice, quizzes are the scrimmage, and tests are game days. If you can understand this, you know why homework is worth so little. Off practice days will hurt a bit, but the grading on it allows room to make mistakes and grow from them. With that said, I'm not going to give As for effort on homework. Sure, if your homework consists of coloring sheets, what else is there to grade other than how pretty the picture is? However, if you are like me and  are actually putting thought and effort into creating homework assignments, then heck no! I'm not taking an "effort grade" for homework. That's what that other 5% is for (if you subscribe to this): participation. 

Would you give this a good effort grade? He did it after all....

We, as teachers, don't want our time wasted Why waste our students' time? It's only more work on us anyway. Give it when it counts. (Just realized I gave my input on homework after saying not now. Procrastination and wordiness at its finest!)

Sunday, June 5, 2011

College-track versus Vocational-track: Why is this a debate?

Two Years at the Blackboard: Mr. N's Curmudgeonly Rant About Everything That is...

I must give a kudos to Mr. N over at Two Years at the Blackboard for his post on the current trend to peddle college to every student. I completely understand that getting a bachelor's degree is worth the large investment in time and money. The data implies that, from the potential earnings standpoint, we should encourage everyone to go a four-year college. However, consider the following: Is it worth it for those who had to drop out due to lack of time, money, etc? Is it worth it for those who don't want to go because they know college "isn't for them"? If you answered "no" to either question or both, then by extension, you don't believe that everyone should go to four-year college. 


It's okay. You are not a bad person for thinking this, especially if you work with kids (However, you may suck as a person if you believe this about kids given social or racial factors. Just saying.) In fact, I believe that all students should be encouraged, if not pushed, into a post-secondary education program. Not necessarily a four-year college, though that's an option. For some of our students, a four-year college is not the best option for them. Not because they are "less than"; it simply comes down to "it is not their thing". This is a hard concept for folks in education to grasp. There isn't a group of factors that we can list and start sorting kids. If that were true, there would be a few less Lifetime movies in existence.

Not going for the obvious "Feed the homeless" extracurricular joke.


We do our students a great disservice when it comes to discussing post-secondary options; we either do a really poor job at discussing options or we don't talk about them at all. I must confess that when I was high school, I looked down on the kids in the vocational track (back when Georgia had one). Sorry, but whenever the counselor interrupted English class once a year, she looked like she was discussing the contents of poo, not post high-school education options.  It wasn't until I realized that I knew a financially successful, hard-working, and smart kid who didn't go to a four-year college, that the vocational path is not one to be looked down upon nor is it one for the "less intelligent". If college were his "thing", my brother would have wiped the floor with the Harvard elite and certainly the nerds at my prestigious public college. However, he chose his own path and is running a pretty successful business of his own (Now that I think about it, he does business with the same nerds from my college). As for me? My name is "Insane" Teacher. Look up the starting salary for one of those.
Accurate depiction of how I look when I open my wallet. 
As for not discussing vocational options, I don't get why not? The HVAC specialist that came by today didn't seem worried about his job security. My car technician is also not worried. However, several of my friends in nice offices are worried. Several teacher friends are worried. Seeing a trend? Many jobs that require an associates or some other training program are more available right now. Jobs that require a bachelor's? Not so much. Bachelors in some domains are a dime-a-dozen, so it is not simply about just getting one (Psychology majors, I'm looking at you! [IT is now avoiding mirrors.]). Besides, have you watched the news on our economy?

Looking from the earning perspective we started with, exhibit A and exhibit B. Many on this path will make as much, if not more, money than I will as a teacher. Certainly more than the social workers working in schools.

I want all of my students to shoot for the moon, and luckily for them, I know that there are several launchpads for them to use. We just need to find the right one. 


Monday, May 30, 2011

Parent-Teacher-Student Relationship: The Blame Game Edition

Through out my first year teaching, I will frequently comment and ask questions about a concept in education that is consistently in heavy rotation: The Parent-Teacher-Student Relationship (henceforth called the PTSR).


Maureen Downey, moderator/writer of the always interesting Get Schooled Blog on AJC.com, published a letter  written by an elementary school administrator, Mr. Dorce. He writes about the tale of a young man he mentored. After attending the young man's graduation and asking about his future, Mr. Dorce realized that all was not as it seemed. Long story short, Mr. Dorce ends with the line, "...I was supposed to help." Please take the time to read the post.


After reading the post and then the comments, the message that I received from the (non-hatred spewing) majority was that the blame for the young man's fate was the parent(s), the young man himself, or both. Many of these comments came from teachers. However, two statements stuck out to me from Mr. Dorce's letter concerning blame for the young man's situation:


"I do not blame anyone in particular for many adults failed Robert, including me."


"Robert is not guiltless. There was plenty that was his responsibility. He could have and should have gotten help for his reading struggles. Lots of people throughout our schools are willing, able and eager to help. He was a child, however, when he started to push back and mask his reading deficiencies." 


As you see, Mr. Dorce does not point out anyone group of people or specific person for Robert's plight, including Robert himself. He does acknowledge that there were several actions Robert could have taken to give himself a better shot at earning his diploma. (He does not discuss the obvious precautionary measures Robert could have taken to avoid fathering children, but I digress.) With all this considered, here's my question. 


Because the blame goes wide and deep, what does assigning blame accomplish, especially when it is assigned to parents and/or students?


To examine this question, let's go back to the PTSR and look at it from the teacher's perspective. I'm well aware of the teacher role, as I'm the teacher! I have direct control over this part, so no problems. The student role is a little trickier; I know what the student should be doing. In reality, this does not always happen. I'll venture a guess and say that students often push back against their role...which is where the teacher role becomes important. As the teacher, I have an element of control here. What I do in my classroom and with my students can have a direct effect on the students.  


To keep score, the teachers have control in two roles in the PTSR: the teacher role and the student role. Granted, the teacher's control of the student role is not 100%, but there are ways of highly stacking the odds in our favor. Continuing on...


The last role is that of the parent. I have a prototype in mind for the parent role, but it's just that, a prototype. It's not real. Different parents have different ideas of the parent role in PTSR. That's not to say there aren't fantastic parents. I have a plethora of examples of fantastic parenting (my parents, for one). Sometimes, though, we have parents of students that are severely lacking. I can meet with them and communicate with them as often as possible and still they won't budge. Needless to say, teachers do not have much control, if any, of the parent role. 


In conclusion:


- Blaming students accomplishes nothing, because the teacher has an element of control over the student role. The amount of control of the student role depends on the individual teacher. We can do something here!


- Blaming parents accomplishes nothing, because there is nothing to little that can be done to control parents. Sorry, it's fact. The overly involved parents will almost always continue to be overly involved. The minimally involved parents will almost always continue to be minimally involved. 


The PTSR is important, and I know that I will be discussing it more when I start teaching. When discussing our children's education, instead of being problem-oriented, we should be solutions-oriented. Currently when there's a problem, we try to diagnose to assign blame, not to solve the problem. In keeping with my philosophy, I'm not going to assign blame for the PTSR blame game when failures in our system happen. However, I will offer my first solution of this whole enterprise:


Eliminate the blame game from education all together. In lieu, use the PTSR and the school community to find workable solutions to problems that arise. 


This includes blaming ourselves, because there is nothing to gain by doing so. (Someone will probably need to remind of this in the coming months.) Reflect and problem-solve. Repeat, if necessary. 

Saturday, April 23, 2011

Why "Teaching is Insanity"

Beau: "You want to teach? Why?"
Insane Teacher: "I can't pinpoint one thing or another. There's the students and watching them learn and grow. There's the gratification of passing on knowledge to a new generation. I don't know. My heart is into teaching, not medicine anymore. Why should not follow my passion? Think about it. Why do you want to go into medicine?"
Beau: "There's money, prestige, and doing cool [crap] like cutting open people and saving lives. All good reasons to stick with medicine. There's no good reason to teach. Teaching is insanity."

- From a conversation between Insane Teacher and Beau (at the time), circa 2008.
_______________________________________

As I've been searching for a job, I keep thinking back to the exchange above. At the time, I was in the midst of taking the prerequisite classes needed to apply to med school. I picked my college on the assumption that I would go into medicine, and it never crossed my mind that I would do anything else. Who knew that 35 kids would rock my world?

As a part-time job, I worked with kids after school. I took the job thinking it would be an easy, part-time cash. I unconsciously learned the first rule of working with kids: IT'S HARD WORK! Between the fighting and crying and whining, they drove me up the wall. There were many times I thought of quitting, but for some reason, I never did. I couldn't, in fact. When the kids weren't driving me crazy (and even when they were), they had a way of charming me and winning me over.

Eventually, the prereqs and looking at med schools started to appear in the rearview and looking at pathways to teach appeared in front. Soon after, I changed my major from biology to something else that I thought would be more beneficial to me as a teacher. I signed up for some math classes and that was it. My mind and college track was changed!
___________________________________________

The exchange above happen when I announced to the BF at the time what my new career path would be. I keep think back to it, because he was right. To want to teach right now is "utter foolish[ness]." The current climate out is downright hostile towards teachers and other officials in education right now. I can't say that I disagree with some of the reasons of the hostility, as I see where it comes from. However, I want to focus on the positives of teaching and learning. Hopefully, this blog will help spread the positive, so that teaching (and education, in general) doesn't seem so insane to future educators and stakeholders in our public education system. 

As I close in on finding a job (prayers and crossed fingers, please!), I'm holding onto the reasons I want to teach and what I hope to bring into the profession: positivity and solutions. FYI, I'm wanting to teaching middle school math and/or science. I will post later on job status. As I embark on this first year of teaching, I want to share my journey, and hopefully, others will share too. 

Much love!